Monday, February 11, 2013

More Presentation Pet Peeves

After going over some basic presentation pet peeves last time we met in class, I've been noticing them more and more...so thanks Sherry! Warnell recently conducted a series of faculty candidate interviews, and some of the candidates demonstrated some serious abilities to teach complex topics of their own research to a diverse crowd (even including undergraduates), other interviewees were not as effective. For one person, the most aggravating and unnerving thing he did during his talk was paced back and forth along a small line for the first 5 minutes and then basically stood in one spot for the remaining 40 minutes. This person had some very exciting research that he was presenting (one part focused on an endangered black bear and its conflicts with nearby residents), but his physical demeanor added no dynamic qualities to the presentation. Also, as soon as I noticed the behavior, it was all I could think of, and that's kinda the key reason how all these little pet peeves can ultimately be counterproductive to good teaching.

A second pet peeve I've noticed revolves around learning objectives. I used to write off the idea that all good lessons must have clearly stated learning objectives at the beginning. I still think there are plenty of alternative ways of teaching, but I've recently seen presentation after presentation in one particular class where the beginning learning objectives are absent entirely. The instructor generally has a set of lesson plans that he goes through, but they do not coincide with specific class periods. In other words, he'll end one lesson in the middle of class, go right into the next, and pick up with that same lesson (on any random slide) the next class. I would say 90% of our lectures this semester have begun in the middle of a topic with no more than a one sentence introduction of something we covered up to 5 days ago. Fortunately, this is a class I've TAed for before, and I know the material so I'm not lost without my learning objectives. Can't really say that for the 12 students in the class though, and it's getting egregious enough that I should probably discuss it with the instructor. Thus, pet peeve #2 more generally addresses whenever a presenter forgets that the audience will probably not remember what you talked about 5 minutes ago, let alone in a previous lecture. So per the saying, you have to tell them what you're going to tell them, tell them, and tell them what you told them.

1 comment:

  1. First of all, I apologize for drawing your attention to these things. Knowledge is power, but it is also a burden! It is really challenging to focus on a presenter's message when they haven't made clear what that message is or when their behavior is distracting from that message. At least you won't be that presenter!

    ReplyDelete